Swayless

Impartial relationship audit

ChatGPT always says you're right. We don't.

Get an honest read on your disagreement, grounded in the facts — not just in how you feel.

See where I might be wrong

3 minutes. No account before your story.

An excerpt, not a promise

Your grievance holds up: a clear commitment was made, then not kept.

This is the shape of a conclusion: what holds, what stays an assumption, and how confident it is.

Example — fictional excerpt
Exhibit 02

On the broken agreement

From the account[A · ¶3]
“We'd promised to talk it over before inviting anyone.”
Fact
A verbal agreement existed.
Interpretation
That it was “broken on purpose” is still your assumption.
Confidence: medium

Illustrative example. Your report is built on your own answers.

The signature: what their version changed

When your partner replies, the report is revised — and we show the exact edits, nothing hidden.

After your partner's reply

Responsibility

Mostly theirsShared

Their version adds a message you hadn't mentioned.

For example
“You say an agreement was broken. Your account also shows your reaction made the conflict worse.”

Why it stings, and why that helps

An analysis that can disagree with you

We start by checking the facts. We grant what's legitimate in your reaction, then look hard at the rest.

Built on this case, not on generalities

We separate what you know from what you assume. Every conclusion quotes your own words and states how confident it is.

Your answers stay separate

Only the synthesis is shared. Your partner answers on their own side; you never see their raw answers, and they don't see yours.

How it works

  1. You tell the conflict freely, then answer 2–3 targeted questions.
  2. You get a free preview, then the full report.
  3. Your partner can respond on their own side.
  4. The report is revised: here's exactly what their version changed.

Ready to find out where you might be wrong?

See where I might be wrong

3 minutes. No account before your story.